[Freeipa-devel] [PATCHSET] Replica promotion patches

Simo Sorce simo at redhat.com
Tue Sep 29 16:47:30 UTC 2015


On 29/09/15 11:50, Oleg Fayans wrote:
> Hi Simo,
>
> It seems to have resolved the initial issue, but now the build fails due
> to lint complaints: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/272714/54174014/

These happens if you do not have custodia installed.
I guess I should make it also a BuildRequires ?

Simo.

> On 09/29/2015 04:54 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On 29/09/15 10:39, Oleg Fayans wrote:
>>> Hi Simo,
>>>
>>> Is this [1] the correct link to the repo containing all latest
>>> replica-promotion patches? I tried to build the packages from this code
>>> and the build failed due to libpdb not having make_pdb_method [2]
>>> I was able to successfully build from the clean upstream tree on the
>>> same machine.
>>
>>
>> I rebased it on top of current master, let me know if this helps.
>>
>> Simo.
>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/simo/public_git/freeipa.git/log/?h=custodia-review
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [2] https://paste.fedoraproject.org/272672/53685114/
>>>
>>> On 09/29/2015 03:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>>> On 29/09/15 09:28, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:10:30AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the problem is that the patch was pushed prematurely.
>>>>>> The option should become unused once the other patches in this
>>>>>> patchset are
>>>>>> applied, that is why that patch was not on top of the list but rather
>>>>>> down
>>>>>> close to the bottom.
>>>>>
>>>>> Simo,
>>>>>
>>>>> could you please add the
>>>>>
>>>>>     How To Test
>>>>>
>>>>> steps to http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/Replica_Promotion?
>>>>>
>>>>> It would make the functional check of this patchset easier, spelling
>>>>> out how the workflow is supposed to work.
>>>>
>>>> Done.
>>>>
>>>> HTH,
>>>> Simo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York




More information about the Freeipa-devel mailing list