[Freeipa-devel] Travis CI broke after merging PR 177

Fraser Tweedale ftweedal at redhat.com
Tue Dec 13 12:41:42 UTC 2016


On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:11:37PM +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
> On 12/13/2016 01:07 PM, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:41:40AM +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
> > > Hi list,
> > > 
> > > https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/177 was recently merged despite
> > > causing nearly half of the tests in our Travis CI gating to fail. This broke
> > > Travis CI for all other PR that were rebased after this merge, causing false
> > > negative errors everywhere.
> > > 
> > > Fraser reverted the offending commits in
> > > https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/329 which restored Travis to
> > > original state (never mind PEP8 errors they were in the original code
> > > already).
> > > 
> > > Regarding this issues I have two questions:
> > > 
> > > a)
> > > 
> > > should I merge https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/329 and thus revert
> > > the breakage in order to unblock other contributors? Given the current
> > > traffic I think it is sufficient to wait for us to investigate and produce a
> > > fix. If not, please scream loudly.
> > > 
> > Definitely not, I am using this PR as a playground to poke the CI in
> > various ways.  Also, proper fix would be best :)  See also my other
> > mail (I would have replied here but fetchmail was not fetching mail
> > and I missed it until just now >_<).
> > 
> > > b)
> > > 
> > > what can we improve to make the results of CI more visible to contributors?
> > > I think that I should sit down with Martin 2 and investigate the possibility
> > > to send notifications about negative CI results (sufficient IMO) to the
> > > mailing list.
> > > 
> > Or the commit author.
> > 
> > It would be *great* if the test job, in event of failure, would
> > collect all the obvious logs and dump them somewhere as artifacts.
> > 
> 
> That would be great but AFAIK Travis CI does support only archiving
> artifacts into a running AWS instance[1] which we do not have and would have
> to buy, run and maintain ourselves. For now we have to inspect the log dumps
> generated in the job output.
> 
Do the containers not have internet access?  That is all you really
need, surely.

The log dumps are not enough... `tail -n 5000' is not enough :)

Even if there is no other way besides S3, it might still be worth
it.

> > > In the meanwhile I would like to ask all reviewers to carefully check the
> > > output of failed Travis CI runs. If the job fails, you will see the results
> > > at the very end of the log. There are two sections: PEP8 errors and test
> > > output. You can expand both of them to see what went wrong and report it to
> > > the PR author if necessary.
> > > 
> > > The reviewer and author can then use the very same tool used in CI [1] to
> > > reproduce the failures locally. Using  '--no-cleanup' option during the run
> > > [2] leaves behind a running container which you can attach to and
> > > investigate further.
> > > 
> > > [1] https://github.com/freeipa/ipa-docker-test-runner
> > > [2] https://github.com/freeipa/ipa-docker-test-runner/blob/master/README.md
> > > 
> > > If you have any additional questions/suggestions about Travis feel free to
> > > contact me.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Martin^3 Babinsky
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
> > > Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code
> 
> [1] https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/uploading-artifacts/
> 
> -- 
> Martin^3 Babinsky




More information about the Freeipa-devel mailing list