[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH 0416][WIP] fix broken configuration of sidgen and extdom plugins
Petr Vobornik
pvoborni at redhat.com
Fri Feb 19 13:57:18 UTC 2016
On 02/19/2016 11:12 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016, Martin Basti wrote:
>> WIP patch attached
>>
>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5665
>>
> Comments inline.
>
>> + # we need to run sidgen task
>> + sidgen_task_dn = DN("cn=sidgen,cn=ipa-sidgen-task,cn=tasks,"
>> + "cn=config")
>> + sidgen_tasks_attr = {
>> + "objectclass": ["top", "extensibleObject"],
>> + "cn": ["sidgen"],
>> + "delay": [0],
>> + "nsslapd-basedn": [self.api.env.basedn],
>> + }
> May be you are better to name this task more uniquely?
> Something like 'cn=generate domain sid,cn=...'?
>
>> +
>> + task_entry = ldap.make_entry(sidgen_task_dn,
>> + **sidgen_tasks_attr)
>> + try:
>> + ldap.add_entry(task_entry)
>> + except errors.DuplicateEntry:
>> + self.log.debug("sidgen task already created")
>> + else:
>> + self.log.debug("sidgen task has been created")
> There could be multiple tasks running in parallel, that's why it could
> be good to use a different and unique name.
>
>> + # we have to check all trusts domains which have been added
>> after the
>> + # upgrade that caused bug was done.
>> +
>> + base_dn = DN(self.api.env.container_adtrusts,
>> self.api.env.basedn)
>> + trust_domain_entries, truncated = ldap.find_entries(
>> + base_dn=base_dn,
>> + scope=ldap.SCOPE_ONELEVEL,
>> + attrs_list=[attr_name, "cn"],
>> + )
>> +
>> + if truncated:
>> + self.log.warning("update_sids: Search results were
>> truncated")
>> +
>> + for entry in trust_domain_entries:
>> + if entry.single_value[attr_name] is None:
>> + domain = entry.single_value["cn"]
>> + self.log.error(
>> + "Your trust to %s is broken. Please re-create it
>> by "
>> + "running 'ipa trust-add' again", domain)
>> +
>> + sysupgrade.set_upgrade_state('sidgen', 'update_sids', False)
>> + return False, ()
> This part looks fine. Basically, a similar check needs to be added to
> trust_find, trust_show, and may be trust_add.
>
Why trust-add?
I'm not a big fan of cluttering existing commands(find, show, mod) with
logic to fix one upgrade bug. But I understand a need to communicate it
somehow.
Would it make sense to move such logic to a separate command, e.g.
trust-check/trust-verify? The command can do additional check in a future.
--
Petr Vobornik
More information about the Freeipa-devel
mailing list