<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> On 05/13/2011 04:10 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:4DCD9051.3040908@redhat.com" type="cite">The UI team had asked that we provide some group info (GID, description) when showing users. This ads a special call to group_find to get this information. It is returned as a list of dicts. ticket 107 rob <pre wrap=""> <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset> _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Freeipa-devel@redhat.com">Freeipa-devel@redhat.com</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel</a></pre> </blockquote> I wonder if this is the wrong abstraction. As we discussed today, we need to do many of these types of cross referential searches. Bascially, we need to be able to filter on 'member' and 'memberof' type relationships. So if we did a group_find --member_user=ayoung it would return all groups that I am a member of. This would work across the board for association facets </body> </html>