<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/15/2014 09:05 PM, Nathaniel
McCallum wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:1410807911.4238.6.camel@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">This plugin ensures that all counter/watermark operations are atomic
and never decrement. Also, deletion is not permitted.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4494">https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4494</a>
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Freeipa-devel@redhat.com">Freeipa-devel@redhat.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Hello Nathaniel,<br>
<br>
</font>
<blockquote><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Starting
looking at it, I have just a question about sanitize_input.<br>
If the modification (replace) is related to counter/watermark,
it triggers an internal search on the target entry itself.<br>
The original/modified entry is also present in the pblock. The
internal search will check the filter but except that what is
the benefit vs<br>
taking the entry directly in the pblock.<br>
<br>
thanks<br>
thierry<br>
</font></blockquote>
</body>
</html>