<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/23/2015 03:38 PM, Ludwig Krispenz
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:562A3862.3060102@redhat.com" type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
        http-equiv="Content-Type">
      <br>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/23/2015 03:19 PM, thierry
        bordaz wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote cite="mid:562A33E1.4070507@redhat.com" type="cite">
        <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
          http-equiv="Content-Type">
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi Ludwig,<br>
          <br>
          Thanks for the patch.<br>
          Yes it is looking good to me. Just a minor change about the
          message logged (if case of failure to add the cleanallruv
          task), you may recommend to the administrator the exact
          command to run.<br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      no, also we do not know why it failed, there would be the option
      to do it via ipa-replica-manage or ldapmodify, the logging that
      creating the task failed should be be enough to start
      investigation and do a manual cleanallruv<br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Ok. I agree. Thanks<br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:562A3862.3060102@redhat.com" type="cite">
      <blockquote cite="mid:562A33E1.4070507@redhat.com" type="cite">
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> <br>
          ACK<br>
          <br>
          thanks<br>
          thierry<br>
          On 10/23/2015 02:27 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote cite="mid:562A27CC.1070402@redhat.com" type="cite">
          <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
            http-equiv="Content-Type">
          Hi Thierry,<br>
          <br>
          hope this addresses your concerns<br>
          <br>
          Ludwig<br>
          <br>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/23/2015 11:24 AM, thierry
            bordaz wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote cite="mid:5629FCE7.9070709@redhat.com" type="cite">
            <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
              http-equiv="Content-Type">
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/23/2015 11:00 AM, thierry
              bordaz wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote cite="mid:5629F72D.9020807@redhat.com"
              type="cite">
              <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
                http-equiv="Content-Type">
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/12/2015 01:17 PM,
                Ludwig Krispenz wrote:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote cite="mid:561B96CE.9060404@redhat.com"
                type="cite">
                <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
                  http-equiv="Content-Type">
                <br>
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/12/2015 12:44 PM,
                  Martin Basti wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote cite="mid:561B8F0B.4070907@redhat.com"
                  type="cite">
                  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
                    http-equiv="Content-Type">
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 23.07.2015 10:46,
                    Ludwig Krispenz wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                  <blockquote cite="mid:55B0A9F0.4010602@redhat.com"
                    type="cite">The attached patch moves the cleaning of
                    the RUV into the topology plugin. <br>
                    <br>
                    I encountered a problem when removing a replica,
                    which disconnects the topology, but it was fixed
                    with my WIP for #5072. <br>
                    <br>
                    I want to keep these issues separate, so please
                    review and test the patch and let me know about
                    issues found <br>
                    <br>
                    Ludwig <br>
                    <br>
                    <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                    <br>
                  </blockquote>
                  <br>
                  Is this patch still valid and pending review?<br>
                </blockquote>
                it should be  still valid, waiting for review, wanted to
                rebase after topology/promotion patches have been
                checked in and resend<br>
                <br>
                <br>
                <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                <br>
              </blockquote>
              <font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Hello Ludwig,<br>
                <br>
                The patch looks good. I have few minor remarks:</font><br>
              <ul>
                <li><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Are the
                    hostname in ruv always fqdn ? to retrieve the RUV
                    element of a given host you use 'strstr'.<br>
                    If you have host vm-11 and vm-112, I wonder if it
                    could pickup the wrong RUV element</font></li>
                <li><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">In
                    ipa_topo_util_cleanruv_element you need a
                    pblock_done/free (or destroy)<br>
                  </font></li>
                <li><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">In it
                    fails to add the clearn-ruv task, you should log a
                    message so that the admin knows what to do.</font></li>
              </ul>
              <p><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">thanks<br>
                  thierry<br>
                </font></p>
              <br>
              <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
            <font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Hi Ludwig,<br>
              <br>
              Additional question. cleanruv is done with
              'replica-force-cleaning: yes'. Currently
              ipa-replica-manage does not implement this flag.<br>
              Why do you use it in topology plugin.<br>
              My concern is that if we delete a host before all the
              updates from that host has been received, could we receive
              a late update that will recreate the ruv element ?<br>
              <br>
              thanks<br>
              thierry<br>
            </font> </blockquote>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>