<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Here it is again<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/12/2015 01:17 PM, Ludwig Krispenz
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:561B96CE.9060404@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/12/2015 12:44 PM, Martin Basti
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:561B8F0B.4070907@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 23.07.2015 10:46, Ludwig
Krispenz wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:55B0A9F0.4010602@redhat.com" type="cite">The
attached patch moves the cleaning of the RUV into the topology
plugin. <br>
<br>
I encountered a problem when removing a replica, which
disconnects the topology, but it was fixed with my WIP for
#5072. <br>
<br>
I want to keep these issues separate, so please review and
test the patch and let me know about issues found <br>
<br>
Ludwig <br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Is this patch still valid and pending review?<br>
</blockquote>
it should be still valid, waiting for review, wanted to rebase
after topology/promotion patches have been checked in and resend<br>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>