<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25.02.2016 11:07, Milan Kubík wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:56CED260.4080703@redhat.com" type="cite">On
02/25/2016 11:07 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 25.2.2016 11:03, Milan Kubík wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 02/15/2016 05:39 PM, Lukas Slebodnik
wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On (15/02/16 17:00), Petr Vobornik
wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 02/15/2016 04:37 PM, Milan Kubík
wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Reflect the updated name of the
package.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
Seems to me as a packaging bug in python-polib. It should
use
<br>
python_provide
<br>
macro to handle the transition.
<br>
</blockquote>
There is not a bug in python-polib
<br>
<br>
sh# rpm -q python2-polib
<br>
python2-polib-1.0.7-2.fc23.noarch
<br>
<br>
sh# rpm -q --provides python2-polib
<br>
python-polib = 1.0.7-2.fc23
<br>
python2-polib = 1.0.7-2.fc23
<br>
<br>
However it is a change in behaviour in dnf/yum.
<br>
You can see more details in BZ1291850 or better BZ1096506.
<br>
<br>
This a readon why "dnf builddep" will try to remove package.
<br>
(it's not downgrade from dnf point of view)
<br>
<br>
sh# dnf builddep freeipa.spec
<br>
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:17:37 ago on Mon
Feb 15
<br>
16:19:14
<br>
2016.
<br>
Package python-setuptools-18.0.1-2.fc23.noarch is already
installed,
<br>
skipping.
<br>
Package systemd-222-10.fc23.x86_64 is already installed,
skipping.
<br>
Package systemd-222-10.fc23.x86_64 is already installed,
skipping.
<br>
Error: installed package python2-polib-1.0.7-2.fc23.noarch
obsoletes
<br>
python-polib < 1.0.7-2.fc23 provided by
python-polib-1.0.3-6.fc23.noarch
<br>
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace
conflicting
<br>
packages)
<br>
<br>
<br>
You might try to file a dnf BZ but mine 1291850 was two
tiles closed
<br>
as not a
<br>
but and then closed as a duplicate of another bug.
<br>
<br>
IMHO the simplest solution would to push the patch with
better
<br>
explanation
<br>
in's a workaround.
<br>
<br>
LSommit message becuase it's a workaround.
<br>
<br>
LS
<br>
</blockquote>
Updated patch with reworded commit message.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Please also add "workaround for
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096506">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096506</a>" comment
above the changed requires.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
Done.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
ACK, but missing ticket<br>
</body>
</html>