<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2016-09-23 10:27 GMT+02:00 Lukas Slebodnik <<a href="mailto:lslebodn@redhat.com" target="_blank">lslebodn@redhat.com</a>>: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On (13/09/16 16:18), Rob Verduijn wrote: >2016-09-13 15:07 GMT+02:00 Lukas Slebodnik <<a href="mailto:lslebodn@redhat.com">lslebodn@redhat.com</a>>: > >> On (13/09/16 10:39), Sumit Bose wrote: >> >On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:13:12AM +0200, Rob Verduijn wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Thanks that did it. >> >> >> >> Is there a less painfull way to be notified of these changes ? >> >> >> >> My nfs configuration gets broken much more than I like because of >> changes >> >> like these. >> >> I know fedora is supposed to be testing grounds unstable software, but I >> >> would really like to hear a heads up more often. >> > >> >The change was mentioned in the upstream release notes of SSSD-1.14.1 >> ><a href="https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Releases/Notes-1.14.1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Releases/Notes-1.14.1</a> but of course I >> >cannot be expected to read all upstream release note before running 'dnf >> >update'. >> > >> >The change was necessary because before the plugin was in the >> >sssd-common package and this caused that some nfs dependencies were >> >pulled in even on systems where nfs is not needed at all. Since neither >> >SSSD nor nfs-idmap strictly require the plugin the new package is not >> >automatically installed during update. >> > >> >> Sorry for troubles. We can add weak dependency info sssd-common on >> sssd-nfs-idmap and it might be installed by default. >> IIRC dnf does not inform about suggested packages; but recommends minght >> work. Feel free ot file a BZ. >> >> The reason why it is in separate package is "container world". >> You need to have install packge sssd-nfs-idmap on host >> but sssd can be running in container. >> >> LS >> > > >I probably should've noticed that the version number went from 1.13.x to >1.14.x which usually is something noteworthy. >I'll just add the release notes from sssd to my list of must reads when >there is an update. > The package sssd-nfs-idmap should be installed with sssd-1.14.1-3 It needn't be due to weak dependencies. But recommended packages are installed by default with dnf. rpm -q --recommends sssd-common-1.14.1-3 libsss_autofs(x86-64) = 1.14.1-3.fc24 libsss_sudo = 1.14.1-3.fc24 sssd-nfs-idmap = 1.14.1-3.fc24 LS </blockquote></div> Does this also apply when you run dnf update ? </div><div class="gmail_extra">Rob Verduijn </div></div>