Re: [K12OSN] LTSP vs PC

["John P. Conlon" <jconlon1 elp rr com>]

If Macs ae better then why did Bill Gates buy 25% of the company?  It was to keep M$ from having a true monopoly when Mac went bankrupt.
Bye
Pat

Henry Hartley wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Hays [mailto:haysja sages us] 
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 9:17 AM

I started to answer this last night but didn't send it.  My
answer was similar to George's.  Here is what I run into:

"This is not what the kids will see in college or the work place."
      

This is just plain wrong, at least the college part.  Here's a quote
from Mark Andreessen in BusinessWeek:

	"Another key thing to remember is that everyone coming
	out of college is familiar with Linux. It has over-
	whelming market share in colleges and universities. In
	every computer science program I'm aware of, it's the
	default language people teach on. They like it because
	it's open-source, and you can look at how it really
	works. The reason that's important is because those
	kids leaving college will enter the workforce and
	bring those skills to their employers."

  

"Macs are simply better and I can show you Total Cost of Ownership
studies to back that up."  (Of course, could these TCO studies
have been done by Apple?)
      

>From the same article:

	"Most of the studies that show Linux is not cheaper
	have been funded by the old vendors. You'll typically
	find an analyst study that was paid for by Sun or
	Microsoft. That's compromised research.
	
	"What the customers will tell us, and I am not in the
	business of selling hardware or operating systems, is
	that they're saving a lot of money. Morgan Stanley
	has an 80-20 rule. That rule goes like this: They're
	replacing 80% of their Sun system with Intel boxes for
	20% of the cost."

http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2004/tc20040330_9468_tc167
.htm