<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:eharrison@mail.mesd.k12.or.us">eharrison@mail.mesd.k12.or.us</a> wrote: <blockquote cite="mid1103234583.25963.123.camel@ltsp.mesd.k12.or.us" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">I'm still banging away at the 4.2.0 beta ISO boot issue. The only thing that comes to my mind that may make a difference is the ordering of the the files on the disks. I built new ISOs with the RH9 version of mkisofs, and it does indeed put the files in a different order. So we'll give this a spin. If you are one of the lucky few that has a machine that won't boot off the 4.2.0 beta CDs, please test this... <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="ftp://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/pub/K12LTSP/4.2.0/iso/">ftp://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/pub/K12LTSP/4.2.0/iso/</a> rsync -Pav k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us::K12LTSP-beta/ . <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://sunsite.utk.edu/ftp/pub/linux/k12ltsp/4.2.0/iso/">http://sunsite.utk.edu/ftp/pub/linux/k12ltsp/4.2.0/iso/</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="ftp://sunsite.utk.edu/pub/linux/k12ltsp/4.2.0/iso/">ftp://sunsite.utk.edu/pub/linux/k12ltsp/4.2.0/iso/</a> -Eric </pre> <pre wrap=""> <hr size="4" width="90%"> _______________________________________________ K12OSN mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:K12OSN@redhat.com">K12OSN@redhat.com</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn</a> For more info see <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://www.k12os.org"><http://www.k12os.org></a> </pre> </blockquote> Hi Eric, Nope doesn't seem to make a difference, on some units it works & others it doesn't. At least the problem is consistant........ P-II 233 OK P-III 733 no P-III 450 no dual P-III 600 no P-IV 2.2 OK P-IV 2.66 OK dual P-II 400 no that's basically the same as before... thanks for trying norbert </body> </html>