I agree that putting gig is going to help on the terminals overall but I've seen video performance vary widely across the board depending on the video card used in the terminal. I've found older pci ATI cards work pretty well. I'd take a look at the video subsystem also. You will get improved performance on the terminals by using gig but you might just end up masking the 'real' problem. Eventually it will rear its head again someday. Jack <div>On 3/2/06, Mark Goodridge <<a href="mailto:mgoodridge@chelseaeagles.org">mgoodridge@chelseaeagles.org</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> light being wrote: > I have a network with only six five terminals, but it seems that already > the video performance has a bottleneck somewhere... perhaps the 100Mbit/s > > Has anyone seen there to be a marked improvement on switching to > 1000Mbit/s ??? Absolutely. I put a gigabit switch between my server and four thin clients and the improvement was very significant. Wouldn't run without one. -- Mark Goodridge The Computer Guy Chelsea Elementary School _______________________________________________ K12OSN mailing list <a href="mailto:K12OSN@redhat.com">K12OSN@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn"> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn</a> For more info see <<a href="http://www.k12os.org">http://www.k12os.org</a>> </blockquote></div>