<div>On 9/4/06, Kevin Verheyen <<a href="mailto:thepiano@telenet.be">thepiano@telenet.be</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Speaking for belgian users (speaking for me offcourse ;-) an update for openoffice to 2.X would be wonderfull too, as the belgian governement has adopted ODF as standard documentation format.</blockquote><div> Centos 4.4 includes an update to OOo 1.1.5 which includes read support for ODF. I don't think you can save though. But 2.0 can read the old format. </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Kevin Op 2-sep-06, om 17:49 heeft Peter Hartmann het volgende geschreven: > I'd like the new features but wouldn't mind being able to boot and use > the old tree if things didn't work out right off the bat client-side. > But I don't know if that would be complicated to automate. > > Thanks Eric > > > -Peter > > On 9/1/06, Eric Harrison <<a href="mailto:eharrison@mail.mesd.k12.or.us">eharrison@mail.mesd.k12.or.us </a>> wrote: >> >> CentOS 4.4 has been released & I've started work on K12LTSP 4.2.4EL. >> >> The question is how stable should the stable branch be? >> >> >> There are a half-dozen end-user applications that can be updated. >> These >> would be essentially back-ports from FC5 (K12LTSP 5.0). Does anyone >> using K12LTSP 4.2EL have concerns about bumping up to the >> latest-and-greatest of any of these packages? >> >> >> Package Name K12LTSP 4.2.3EL version Latest version >> ------------ ------------------------ --------------------------- >> blender 2.37-2.k12ltsp.4.2.2EL 2.42-6.fc5 >> celestia 1.3.2-3.k12ltsp.4.2.2EL 1.4.1-5.fc5 >> childsplay 0.81.1-2.k12ltsp.4.2.2EL 0.83-1.fc5 >> DansGuardian 2.7.6-7.k12ltsp.0.4.0 2.9.7.1-0.k12ltsp.0.5.0.0 >> gcompris 7.1.1-4.k12ltsp.4.2.2EL 7.4-13.fc5 >> inkscape 0.43-1.k12ltsp.4.2.2EL 0.44-4.fc5 >> tuxmath 0.2001.9.7-0103 0.2005.10.11-0 >> >> >> >> The real big question is whether or not to switch from LTSP 4.1 to >> LTSP >> 4.2? This is not an insignificant change, considering that the kernel >> for the terminals is changed from a 2.4 kernel to a 2.6 kernel. >> >> Considering that a "stable" branch should favor stability over >> shiny new >> features, I am currently leaning towards leaving K12LTSP 4.2.4EL with >> the older LTSP 4.1 packages. This is largely a question with >> upgrades, >> so I'd like to hear from those of you currently running K12LTSP >> 4.2.3EL. >> Are the new features in LTSP 4.2 (largely improved USB/CD/floppy >> support) worth the risk of potentially breaking some of your >> terminals? >> >> >> -Eric >> >> _______________________________________________ >> K12OSN mailing list >> <a href="mailto:K12OSN@redhat.com">K12OSN@redhat.com</a> >> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn"> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn</a> >> For more info see <<a href="http://www.k12os.org">http://www.k12os.org</a>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > K12OSN mailing list > <a href="mailto:K12OSN@redhat.com">K12OSN@redhat.com</a> > <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn</a> > For more info see < <a href="http://www.k12os.org">http://www.k12os.org</a>> > _______________________________________________ K12OSN mailing list <a href="mailto:K12OSN@redhat.com">K12OSN@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn"> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn</a> For more info see <<a href="http://www.k12os.org">http://www.k12os.org</a>> </blockquote></div> -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada Fl_TeacherTool <a href="http://www3.telus.net/public/robark/Fl_TeacherTool/">http://www3.telus.net/public/robark/Fl_TeacherTool/</a> C++ GUI tutorial <a href="http://www3.telus.net/public/robark/">http://www3.telus.net/public/robark/ </a>