<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Phydeaux wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:20090902164308.E6ACC7003D1@althea.taco.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">At 12:24 PM 09/02/09, Almquist Burke wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Unless your client's are going to run local applications that use
each use A LOT (like over 2GB) of memory, there isn't any benefit to
going 64 bit at all.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I'm well aware of that.
reb
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Then, in what way do you believe that you're not "taking advantage of
what you've got", as you put it? Is there something unusual that
you're doing that requires 64-bit operation specifically on the thin
client?<br>
<br>
--TP<br>
</body>
</html>