<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 11-08-18 9:28 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4E4D0587.80907@redhat.com" type="cite">Hello,
<br>
<br>
I'd like to start a thread about production deployment. We
currently use webrick and also start it using nohup temporary.
This is definitely the right way of doing things.
<br>
<br>
Quick look on Wikipedia tells:
<br>
<br>
- passenger - "the preferred way to deploy Ruby on Rails
applications"
<br>
- mongrel - good option, but quite old (3 yrs last stable)
<br>
- ?
<br>
<br>
And from the webserver point of view:
<br>
<br>
- apache - defacto standard, great attention in RHEL (security
patches etc), customers already know how to configure it
<br>
- nginx - fast (but do we need that?)
<br>
- ?
<br>
<br>
I've started etherpad on that:
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://gibson.usersys.redhat.com:9000/1X73bNknvz">http://gibson.usersys.redhat.com:9000/1X73bNknvz</a>
<br>
<br>
Would be interesting to do it the same way the other ruby / rails
teams do (aeolus, headpin, ...?)
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<font face="Arial">Other options: mongrel2 and thin. </font>There
might be some issues around passenger (it's not in fedora/rhel, and
probably never will be), so I'd look at mongrel2 and thin first.<br>
-d<br>
</body>
</html>