RE: error handling in %post (was: Re: trying to mount the dvd during post install.)

["Coe, Colin C." <Colin Coe woodside com au>]

We have a minimal %post section that only copies our script ks_post.sh
to /var/tmp and inserts 'sh /var/tmp/ks_post.sh' into /etc/rc.d/rc.local
with a clean up after it has run.

As far as debugging goes, whats wrong with:
%post
set -x
cmd1 &&
cmd2 &&
cmd3 &&
cmd4 ||
fixit

???

All the debugging goes to vt3.

CC

-----Original Message-----
From: kickstart-list-bounces redhat com
[mailto:kickstart-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Ed Brown
Sent: Thursday, 31 August 2006 7:32 AM
To: Discussion list about Kickstart
Subject: error handling in %post (was: Re: trying to mount the dvd
during post install.)


Lambert Tran wrote:
> 
> The trick at time was how to know the installation CD was actually is
> /tmp/cdrom... (your may be /tmp/dvd). To find out, we had a sleep 600
at the
> %post section, and went look around.

%post (and %pre) scripts are versatile and powerful tools, so why does 
the kickstart environment have a reputation of being difficult to work 
in?  How many questions to this list revolve around figuring out how 
to determine what the heck is going on in %pre and %post scripts?  Who 
has chosen to do things with scripts that execute on firstboot, rather 
than try to get something done in %post?  How many of us resort to 
inserting sleeps or other tricks to buy time at a commandline to debug 
problems?  How hard would it be to provide a debug mode, where 
non-zero return codes for commands (either all commands, or possibly 
only for specially-indicated commands) results in seeing the command 
that failed, and the reason/output if any, followed by a shell prompt? 
  Would this be useful for anyone here?  (Is this the wrong list, 
should it be posted to anaconda-devel instead (or also)?)

-Ed?

_______________________________________________
Kickstart-list mailing list
Kickstart-list redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list