<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:54 AM Richard W.M. Jones <<a href="mailto:rjones@redhat.com">rjones@redhat.com</a>> wrote: </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 08:42:19AM -0600, alan somers wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:23 AM Richard W.M. Jones <<a href="mailto:rjones@redhat.com" target="_blank">rjones@redhat.com</a>> > wrote: > > > I pushed 2 & 3, thanks. > > > > But ... > > > > > From 9fa3e443467e3c06761ec54241327e8daf8701ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Alan Somers <<a href="mailto:asomers@gmail.com" target="_blank">asomers@gmail.com</a>> > > > Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:59:53 -0600 > > > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add a Cargo.toml file to the top-level directory > > > > > > This is necessary for other Rust projects to depend on unrelesed > > > versions of the nbdkit crate. > > > --- > > > Cargo.toml | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Cargo.toml > > > > > > diff --git a/Cargo.toml b/Cargo.toml > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 00000000..f50a66b7 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Cargo.toml > > > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > > > +[workspace] > > > +members = ["plugins/rust"] > > > > Is it really absolutely necessary to have this in the top level > > directory of the source tree? > > > > Rich. > > > > Turns out it isn't. It didn't work when I tried it the first time, and I > thought that this was the reason why. But it turns out the real reason was > because you had been generating your Cargo.toml file with autotools. > That's no longer the case, after my last patch. So you don't need the > workspace Cargo.toml file after all. OK, thanks for checking that. If we did need to generate Cargo.toml again in future (eg. to include the nbdkit version number) then we might include the generated file into git, if that helps. In other projects we have included selected generated files in git for various reasons. Rich. </blockquote><div> </div><div>Yeah, that would work. </div></div></div>