[libvirt] [libvirt-php 2/2] Added libvirt-php.obs.spec

Lyre 4179e1 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 15 12:42:59 UTC 2011


On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Justin Clift <jclift at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 15/02/2011, at 10:35 PM, Lyre wrote:
> <snip>
> > The problem was, I'm not quite sure what to do with this spec file.
> >
> > Currently, It may be better to name the spec file libvirt-php.spec.
> >
> > This spec file contains many if...else for compatibility, some macros
> such as %{php_zend_api} are not acceptable in SLES. The original
> php-libvirt.spec may be preferred for Fedora.
> >
> > At last, I intend to use the openSuSE Build Service for easier
> deployment. It will be easier for me to maintain this file if it is
> rejected.
>
> How similar are the spec files?
>
> Lyre, you mention that one of them uses if...else statements to make it
> work in SLES and non-SLES.  Maybe it would be possible to merge the Fedora
> one into that, so a single spec file works on both?
>
> If not, could they be renamed so there's minimal confusion?  Something like
> this:
>
>  libvirt-php.SUSE.spec   (SLES, OpenSUSE, ?)
>  libvirt-php.RedHat.spec (RHEL, Fedora, CentOS, ?)
>
> (they're just suggestions, up to you guys)
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift


In fact, the spec files are quite similar. The new spec is also suitable for
Fedora.

BTW, it is my first time to be involved in an opensource project. Maybe I've
been accustom to that someone will make decision, not me.  It seems that I
should make the decsion now, and I'll try to merge them.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20110215/59a00bba/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the libvir-list mailing list