[libvirt] [PATCH] conf: Resolve Coverity FORWARD_NULL
Michal Privoznik
mprivozn at redhat.com
Wed Aug 5 07:08:33 UTC 2015
On 04.08.2015 17:54, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 08/04/2015 11:42 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 04.08.2015 13:11, John Ferlan wrote:
>>> The recent changes to perform SCSI device address checks during the
>>> post parse callbacks ran afoul of the Coverity checker since the changes
>>> assumed that the 'xmlopt' parameter to virDomainDeviceDefPostParse
>>> would be non NULL (commit id 'ca2cf74e87'); however, what was missed
>>> is there was an "if (xmlopt &&" check being made, so Coverity believed
>>> that it could be possible for a NULL 'xmlopt'.
>>>
>>> Checking the various calling paths seemingly disproves that. If called
>>> from virDomainDeviceDefParse, there were two other possible calls that
>>> would end up dereffing, so that path could not be NULL. If called via
>>> virDomainDefPostParseDeviceIterator via virDomainDefPostParse there
>>> are two callers (virDomainDefParseXML and qemuParseCommandLine)
>>> which deref xmlopt either directly or through another call.
>>>
>>> So I'm removing the check for non-NULL xmlopt.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan at redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>>> index 77a50c3..dd5ebd7 100644
>>> --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>>> +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>>> @@ -4145,7 +4145,7 @@ virDomainDeviceDefPostParse(virDomainDeviceDefPtr dev,
>>> {
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> - if (xmlopt && xmlopt->config.devicesPostParseCallback) {
>>> + if (xmlopt->config.devicesPostParseCallback) {
>>> ret = xmlopt->config.devicesPostParseCallback(dev, def, caps,
>>> xmlopt->config.priv);
>>> if (ret < 0)
>>>
>>
>> ACK
>>
>> Although with the virDomainDefPostParse() it should be the same story.
>> @xmlopt can't be NULL there too. But that can be saved for a follow up
>> patch if you want.
>>
>> Michal
>>
>
> Myopia strikes again... I need a larger workspace!
>
> John
>
> Perhaps it'd be better to squash in the following rather than have a
> separate patch since it's same issue even though Coverity only complained
> about the initial one. Although if it's preferred to have a separate
> patch that's fine by me too:
>
> diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> index 7d3a24d..5eaeb21 100644
> --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> @@ -4190,7 +4190,7 @@ virDomainDefPostParse(virDomainDefPtr def,
> };
>
> /* call the domain config callback */
> - if (xmlopt && xmlopt->config.domainPostParseCallback) {
> + if (xmlopt->config.domainPostParseCallback) {
> ret = xmlopt->config.domainPostParseCallback(def, caps,
> xmlopt->config.priv);
> if (ret < 0)
>
>
I'd prefer to have it in a single patch. ACK with this squashed in then.
Michal
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list