[libvirt] [PATCH] add nested HVM to libxl
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Fri Oct 2 12:18:44 UTC 2015
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 02:08:58PM -0400, Alvin Starr wrote:
> ---
> docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 10 ++++++++++
> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 6 ++++++
> src/conf/domain_conf.h | 2 ++
> src/libxl/libxl_conf.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng b/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
> index f196177..402ff16 100644
> --- a/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
> +++ b/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
> @@ -4083,6 +4083,16 @@
> </element>
> </optional>
> <optional>
> + <element name="nestedhvm">
> + <empty/>
> + </element>
> + </optional>
> + <optional>
> + <element name="mask_svm_npt">
> + <empty/>
> + </element>
> + </optional>
> + <optional>
> <ref name="hyperv"/>
> </optional>
> <optional>
We really shouldn't be adding new schema for this. We should just
toggle enablement of nested SVM/VMX based on whether the <cpu>
model includes the <svm/> or <vmx/> feature flags. This is what
we already do on KVM for enabling this feature, and we'd want
Xen to work the same way IMHO.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list