[PATCH 2/3] virtproxyd: use Wants instead of Requires for sockets

Daniel P. Berrangé berrange at redhat.com
Tue Oct 18 16:23:11 UTC 2022


On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 04:37:31PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> Similarly to commit ec7e31ed3206, allow traditional daemon activation for
> virtproxyd.

I'm not convinced we want todo this.

virtproxyd has supported socket activation since day 1, so I think
we are right to enforce this, as we have no back compat/upgrade
story to consider for virtproxyd, only libvirtd.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan at redhat.com>
> ---
>  src/remote/virtproxyd.service.in | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/remote/virtproxyd.service.in b/src/remote/virtproxyd.service.in
> index f9bb6b84a97a..2557539fca8f 100644
> --- a/src/remote/virtproxyd.service.in
> +++ b/src/remote/virtproxyd.service.in
> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
>  [Unit]
>  Description=Virtualization daemon
>  Conflicts=libvirtd.service
> -Requires=virtproxyd.socket
> -Requires=virtproxyd-ro.socket
> -Requires=virtproxyd-admin.socket
> +Wants=virtproxyd.socket
> +Wants=virtproxyd-ro.socket
> +Wants=virtproxyd-admin.socket
>  After=network.target
>  After=dbus.service
>  After=apparmor.service
> -- 
> 2.38.0
> 

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|


More information about the libvir-list mailing list