<tt>libvir-list-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 05/10/2010 02:35:49 PM: > > Correct, IFLA_VF_PORT_PROFILE is not in the kernel yet. The kernel patch is > be discussed on the kernel netdev mailing list. The most recent discussion > is on ways to merge VDP and CDCP into what I've posted for > IFLA_VF_PORT_PROFILE. > > I'll send out another libvirt patch once the kernel discussions are final. > </tt> <tt>I suppose you will provide the libvirt patch only for what seems to be </tt> <tt>Cisco technology support. Now the slight differences in technology</tt> <tt>that we seem to try to support here are reflected in the parameters that go into</tt> <tt>the XML and end up in the netlink messages. Any way to consolidate that? I suppose</tt> <tt>VM migration between different switch vendors' switch isn't going to be that</tt> <tt>easy?</tt> <tt> Stefan</tt>