<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 9.00.7930.16423"></HEAD>
<BODY style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"
id=MailContainerBody leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area">
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>Hi,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>I'm working on C# bindings, my goal is to expose xml
descriptions (domain, node, storage and so on...) as real C# objects, for this,
I'm studying the rng files provided in /docs/schemas/ directory of the sources.
I'm currently working on domain.rng.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>I don't know if the domain.rng file is up to date
because, for example, the disk device definition in the rng doesn't speak about
the "address" node that a virhs dumpxml show :</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri><disk type='file'
device='disk'><BR> <driver name='qemu'
type='raw'/><BR> <source
file='/var/lib/libvirt/image/Ubuntu-10.10.img'/><BR>
<target dev='hda' bus='ide'/><BR>
<address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0'
unit='0'/><BR></disk></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>Is the domain.rng up to date or should I use the
libvirt.org XML format page only ?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>Arnaud</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>