<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> On 03/21/2012 10:01 PM, Eric Blake wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:4F69DF49.4080102@redhat.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> Only if we want to be sticklers. For reference, in C, void foo(bool x); can be called with a bool (foo(true) or foo(false)), an int (foo(1) or foo(0)), a pointer (foo("") or foo(NULL)). That is, C gives you automatic conversion. In Java, you _have_ to pass a boolean, where void foo(boolean x) {} must be called as foo(true), foo(i != 0), foo(str != null), and so forth, which puts more burden on the caller to do the type conversion up front. Which style describes python code? Is python type-strict, where you have to manually convert to bool in contexts that demand a PyBool, or do you get automatic conversion where the empty string, None, integer 0, and other python objects can be implicitly used in place of the actual False object? Depending on that answer determines whether you should be using PyBool_Check and rejecting invalid types, or whether you allow all python objects with their normal conversion to boolean. And my limited understanding (given that I have not done much python coding) is that python is relaxed like C, not strict like Java. In other words, I think we should allow users to call dom.getCPUStats(0, 0) rather than forcing them to call dom.getCPUStats(False, 0), if that is the convention allowed elsewhere in native python code. </pre> </blockquote> Thanks for these ideas I totally agree with them. Guannan Ren </body> </html>