<tt>Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com> wrote on 11/17/2015 03:55:13 PM: > From: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com></tt> <tt>> To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Stefan Berger/ > Watson/IBM@IBMUS, libvir-list@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com</tt> <tt>> Date: 11/17/2015 03:55 PM</tt> <tt>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: adapt sysfs cancel path for new TPM driver</tt> <tt>> > On 11/17/2015 03:49 PM, Stefan Berger wrote: > > On 11/17/2015 02:12 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: > >> First, thanks for following up on the fedora bugs so quickly! > >> > >> On 11/17/2015 10:46 AM, Stefan Berger wrote: > >>> Adapt the sysfs TPM command cancel path for the TPM driver that > >>> does not use a miscdevice anymore since Linux 4.0. Support old > >>> and new paths and check their availability. > >>> > >>> Add a mockup for the test cases to avoid the testing for > >>> availability of the cancel path. > >>> > >> I see you sent a qemu patch for a similar change. What's the benefit of > >> libvirt setting cancel_path if qemu can (and already attempts to)figure it > >> out? > > > > The only benefit is that libvirt is controlling the parameter. > > > > Then IMO we should let qemu handle it and just drop this path handling > entirely. If there's ever a need to differentiate from qemu's logic or let the > user override this value then we can add it back without much trouble > </tt> <tt>Forgot about that: SELinux labeling of that file requires it afaik.</tt> <tt> Stefan</tt>