<div dir="ltr"> <div class="gmail_extra"> <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé <<a href="mailto:berrange@redhat.com" target="_blank">berrange@redhat.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 01:47:26PM +0300, David Kiarie wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé <<a href="mailto:berrange@redhat.com">berrange@redhat.com</a>> > wrote: > > > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 01:36:35PM +0300, David Kiarie wrote: > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:18 PM, David Kiarie <<a href="mailto:davidkiarie4@gmail.com">davidkiarie4@gmail.com</a>> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:15 PM, David Kiarie <<a href="mailto:davidkiarie4@gmail.com">davidkiarie4@gmail.com</a>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé < > > <a href="mailto:berrange@redhat.com">berrange@redhat.com</a>> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:38:59AM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > >>> > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 08:51:01 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote: > > > >>> > > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 09:14:29AM +0300, David Kiarie wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > This is okay but this definitely wrong. And it does indeed > > sound > > > >>> wrong. And > > > >>> > > > it will always sound wrong. > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > Being involved in a GSoC project is not about contributions. > > And > > > >>> also > > > >>> > > > considering the scale of our project(some of the code even > > never > > > >>> got > > > >>> > > > merged). There was a lot of research, design, planning, > > > >>> implementation, > > > >>> > > > review and finally the code got merged. > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > I should at least be able to copyright the file. I mean, Jim > > was > > > >>> my mentor, > > > >>> > > > I did most of the work but his company copyright is right at > > the > > > >>> top of the > > > >>> > > > file - Does this sound okay to you ? > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > You own copyright on any contributions you make, regardless of > > what > > > >>> any > > > >>> > > Copyright statement at the top of the file says. Just like the > > Author > > > >>> > > lines in file headers, these Copyright lines in source files are > > at > > > >>> best > > > >>> > > outdated and incomplete. Anyone who wishes to identify the > > copyright > > > >>> > > ownership has no choice but to look at the git history which > > records > > > >>> > > exactly who wrote what. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Soo, can we also delete the "Copyright ..." lines from the top of > > the > > > >>> > license statement? That's a cleanup which I'll gladly do. > > > >>> > > > >>> No, you can not delete other people's Copyright lines - they are > > > >>> considered > > > >>> part of the license notice so can only be altered by the copyright > > > >>> holder. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> Suse copyright notice has been on this file since the day this file > > got > > > >> merged. To be honest, I did most of the original work so why should > > Suse > > > >> copyright appear here while me doesn't ? > > > >> > > > > > > > > Contrary to the fact that most libvirt developers work for a company, > > this > > > > was mostly independent work. > > > > > > > > > > And I totally don't have a problem with Suse copyrighting the file but > > why > > > can't I do the same ? > > > > You can have Copyright line on any file you made non-trivial contributions > > too. It is upto the person contributing patches to add Copyright line if > > they wish to. The Suse copyright is there simply because their patch > > author chose to add it when they contributed to that file. > > > > > Or, would you rather I use the pseudonym 'Oneko Ltd' instead of just > > > 'Oneko' ? > > > > Copyright lines need to use legal real names, or company name, not > > pseudonyms. > > In which case you mean that if I write a patch copyrighting these file on > the company name 'Oneko and sons' you will merge that patch ? </div></div>Depends on whether that company owns the copyright or not. Copyright is owned by the individual who creates the work, unless a contract of employment requires them to assign copyright to the company instead. So unless you did your GSoC work under such a contract with that company, it would be inappropriate to list them.</blockquote><div> </div><div>But, the individual who created the work was a cat.</div><div> </div><div>Okay, I could copyright this on my name and cat email - does that sound okay ?</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"> Regards, Daniel -- |: <a href="https://berrange.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://berrange.com</a> -o- <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange</a> :| |: <a href="https://libvirt.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://libvirt.org</a> -o- <a href="https://fstop138.berrange.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://fstop138.berrange.com</a> :| |: <a href="https://entangle-photo.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://entangle-photo.org</a> -o- <a href="https://www.instagram.com/dberrange" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.instagram.com/dberrange</a> :| </div></div></blockquote></div> </div></div>