<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Michal, I believe the problem you're trying to fix in this patch is somehow the same I'm trying to fix in this patch here: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2019-June/msg01270.html">https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2019-June/msg01270.html</a> Do you mind taking a look? If that's the case, I can drop that patch from the series that implements Multifunction PCI hotplug. Thanks, DHB <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/14/19 8:57 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:fbe44ae28fe395ae54117f2b38afae8ee4a3efd4.1565777704.git.mprivozn@redhat.com"> <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">The virHostdevPreparePCIDevices() function works in several steps. In the very first one, it checks if devices we want to detach from the host are not taken already by some other domain. However, this piece of code returns different results depending on the stub driver used (which is not wrong per se, but keep on reading). If the stub driver is KVM then virHostdevIsPCINodeDeviceUsed() is called which basically checks if a PCI device from the detach list is not used by any domain (including the one we are preparing the device for). If that is the case, an error is reported ("device in use") and -1 is returned. However, that is not what happens if the stub driver is VFIO. If the stub driver is VFIO, then we iterate over all PCI devices from the same IOMMU group and check if they are taken by some other domain (because a PCI device, well IOMMU group, can't be shared between two or more qemu processes). But we fail to check, if the device we are trying to detach from the host is not already taken by a domain. That is, calling virHostdevPreparePCIDevices() over a hostdev device twice succeeds the first time and fails too late in the second run (fortunately, virHostdevResetAllPCIDevices() will throw an error, but this is already too late because the PCI device in question was moved to the list of inactive PCI devices and now it appears in both lists). Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mprivozn@redhat.com"><mprivozn@redhat.com></a> --- src/util/virhostdev.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/util/virhostdev.c b/src/util/virhostdev.c index cb69582c21..6861b8a84e 100644 --- a/src/util/virhostdev.c +++ b/src/util/virhostdev.c @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct virHostdevIsPCINodeDeviceUsedData { virHostdevManagerPtr mgr; const char *driverName; const char *domainName; - const bool usesVFIO; + bool usesVFIO; }; /* This module makes heavy use of bookkeeping lists contained inside a @@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ virHostdevPreparePCIDevices(virHostdevManagerPtr mgr, virPCIDevicePtr pci = virPCIDeviceListGet(pcidevs, i); bool strict_acs_check = !!(flags & VIR_HOSTDEV_STRICT_ACS_CHECK); bool usesVFIO = (virPCIDeviceGetStubDriver(pci) == VIR_PCI_STUB_DRIVER_VFIO); - struct virHostdevIsPCINodeDeviceUsedData data = {mgr, drv_name, dom_name, usesVFIO}; + struct virHostdevIsPCINodeDeviceUsedData data = {mgr, drv_name, dom_name, false}; int hdrType = -1; if (virPCIGetHeaderType(pci, &hdrType) < 0) @@ -728,18 +728,19 @@ virHostdevPreparePCIDevices(virHostdevManagerPtr mgr, } /* The device is in use by other active domain if - * the dev is in list activePCIHostdevs. VFIO devices - * belonging to same iommu group can't be shared - * across guests. - */ + * the dev is in list activePCIHostdevs. */ devAddr = virPCIDeviceGetAddress(pci); + if (virHostdevIsPCINodeDeviceUsed(devAddr, &data)) + goto cleanup; + + /* VFIO devices belonging to same IOMMU group can't be + * shared across guests. Check if that's the case. */ if (usesVFIO) { + data.usesVFIO = true; if (virPCIDeviceAddressIOMMUGroupIterate(devAddr, virHostdevIsPCINodeDeviceUsed, &data) < 0) goto cleanup; - } else if (virHostdevIsPCINodeDeviceUsed(devAddr, &data)) { - goto cleanup; } } </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>