<html><body>
<p><tt>libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2008-04-21 23:16:27:<br>
<br>
> Guo Lian Yun wrote:<br>
> > # HG changeset patch<br>
> > # User Guolian Yun <yunguol@cn.ibm.com><br>
> > # Date 1208746833 -28800<br>
> > # Node ID 359a198f236c0733587423009200fcde5c2a02f3<br>
> > # Parent  0d31dff13ae341fd6515dc844ee98c7b5300b71d<br>
> > [TEST] .2# rebased VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent.02 for XenFV <br>
> & KVM support<br>
> > <br>
> > Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun <yunguol@cn.ibm.com><br>
> > <br>
> <br>
> This fails for me on F9 using KVM and latest sources.</tt><br>
<br>
<tt>  This fails because of the InstanceID of </tt><tt>ProcResourceAllocationSettingData,</tt><br>
<tt>  </tt><tt>the  "proc_rasd"  is set by '%s/%s' %(test_dom,0) in 02, which can be passed</tt><br>
<tt>  on Xen, actually, the InstanceID has to be update as  %(test_dom, "proc"), right?</tt><br>
<tt>  Then it passes on KVM, fails on Xen. Below is the output of wbemein.</tt><br>
<br>
<tt>  </tt><tt>wbemein <a href="http://root:password@localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData">http://root:password@localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData</a></tt><br>
<tt>  </tt><tt>localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData.InstanceID="Domain-0/0"</tt><br>
<tt>  localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData.InstanceID="Domain-0/1"</tt><br>
<br>
<tt>  I will fix the InstanceID in tc, then would you please apply it?  </tt><br>
<tt>    </tt><br>
<tt><br>
> -- <br>
> Kaitlin Rupert<br>
> IBM Linux Technology Center<br>
> kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com<br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Libvirt-cim mailing list<br>
> Libvirt-cim@redhat.com<br>
> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim</a><br>
</tt></body></html>