<tt>libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2008-09-17 01:54:39: > > > > > > This is the intended behavior. The HosySystem class is just a > > > placeholder - if the guest has the SBLIM providers installed, then the > > > proper class to represent the host is Linux_ComputerSystem (this is the > > > SBLIM provider that represents the "base" or host system). > > > > > > We don't want the HostSystem provider to return anything in this case, > > > because there's no need for a placeholder. > > > > If the HostSystem provider return NULL, how to make test case work? > > Because > > the test expects to return at least one Xen_HostSystem instance. > > Would you please explain more for me on this? Any suggestion on fixing > > them? > > > > The test behavior needs to be changed for the sblim case. > > 1) If SBLIM: Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances > 2) If not SBLIM: Enum of HostSystem returns a single instance > </tt> <tt> If Enum of HostSystem doesn't return any instances with sblim base provider installed,</tt> <tt> how to deal with Host* related test case? The association will return NULL through</tt> <tt> HostSystem such as HostedResourcePool forward query, then what should we do? </tt> <tt> </tt> <tt> Thanks!</tt> <tt> > If you take a look at the get_host() in Virt_HostSystem.c, you'll get an > understanding of how the providers determine whether a SBLIM instance is > available on the system. > > Does this help? > > -- > Kaitlin Rupert > IBM Linux Technology Center > kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com > > _______________________________________________ > Libvirt-cim mailing list > Libvirt-cim@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim </tt>