Virtiofsd

[Simon Fairweather]

Looks like posix lock is already logged. But does not seem to be close to
being implemented

On Thu, 6 Apr 2023, 16:04 Peter Krempa, <pkrempa at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 17:31:37 +0100, Simon Fairweather wrote:
> > Thanks these are missing in rust.
> >
> > <lock posix='on' flock='on'/>
>
> You'll have to raise this with the virtiofsd project:
>
>   https://gitlab.com/virtio-fs/virtiofsd/-/issues
>
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 5:25 PM Peter Krempa <pkrempa at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 17:12:15 +0100, Simon Fairweather wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > In QEMU 8 virtiofsd has been removed in favor of the rust version.
> Which
> > > > includes options that are not longer supported,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do you have a view on what should be used going forwards to support
> > > > virtiofsd in libvirt with qemu 8?
> > > >
> > > > The options are showing as depreciated,
> > > >     -o <compat-options>...
> > > >             Options in a format compatible with the legacy
> implementation
> > > > [deprecated]
> > > >
> > > > Rust version options
> > >
> > > The rust version of virtiofsd is supposed to be compatible with
> > > everything that libvirt used with the C version via the deprecated
> > > compat options above.
> > >
> > > Going forward we'd like to switch to the native syntax:
> > >
> > > https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/431
> > >
> > >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20230406/8f2fb2e9/attachment-0001.htm>