<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Hi, I noticed that libvirt support the following hypervisors currently: <ul> <li> The <a href="http://libvirt.org/drvqemu.html">KVM/QEMU</a> Linux hypervisor </li> <li> The <a href="http://libvirt.org/drvxen.html">Xen</a> hypervisor on Linux and Solaris hosts. </li> <li> The <a href="http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.html">LXC</a> Linux container system </li> <li> The <a href="http://libvirt.org/drvopenvz.html">OpenVZ</a> Linux container system </li> <li> The <a href="http://libvirt.org/drvuml.html">User Mode Linux</a> paravirtualized kernel </li> <li> The <a href="http://libvirt.org/drvvbox.html">VirtualBox</a> hypervisor </li> <li> The <a href="http://libvirt.org/drvesx.html">VMware ESX and GSX</a> hypervisors </li> <li> The <a href="http://libvirt.org/drvvmware.html">VMware Workstation and Player</a> hypervisors </li> <li> The <a href="http://libvirt.org/drvhyperv.html">Microsoft Hyper-V</a> hypervisor </li> </ul> "the goal of libvirt: to provide a common and stable layer sufficient to securely manage domains on a node, possibly remote." My question is, does redhat's libvirt team have the plan to support IBM PowerVM hypervisor? If the answer is NO, what's the reason to make the support for IBM PowerVM hypervisor doesn't make sense... BRs, Dennis </body> </html>