<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Take a look at Madison Kellys' various blog postings at
alteeve.com.</p>
<p>She has a generally very good set of how to's on how to build a 2
node cluster.<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/30/2018 10:32 AM, Cobin Bluth
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAGvEgFGBuOtdF6dWa-qA-PmVWVRkUE-665GqKY=474cgvWNnew@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">Hello Libvirt Users,<br>
<br>
I would like to setup a two node bare-metal cluster. I need to
guidance on the network configuration. I have attached a small
diagram, the same diagram can be seen here: <a
href="https://i.imgur.com/SOk6a6G.png" moz-do-not-send="true">https://i.imgur.com/SOk6a6G.png</a><br>
<br>
I would like to configure the following details:<br>
- Each node has a DHCP enabled guest network where VMs will run.
(eg, <font face="monospace"><b><a href="http://192.168.1.0/24"
moz-do-not-send="true">192.168.1.0/24</a></b></font> for
Host1, and <font face="monospace"><b><a
href="http://192.168.2.0/24" moz-do-not-send="true">192.168.2.0/24</a></b></font>
for Host2)<br>
- Any guest in Host1 should be able to ping guests in Host2, and
vice versa.<br>
- All guests have routes to reach the open internet (so that '<font
face="monospace"><b>yum update</b></font>' will work
"out-of-the-box")<br>
- Each node will be able to operate fully if the other physical
node fails. (no central DHCP server, etc)<br>
- I would like to <u>add more physical nodes later</u> when I
need the resources.<br>
<br>
This is what I have done so far:<br>
- Installed latest Ubuntu 18.04, with latest version of libvirt
and supporting software from ubuntu's apt repo.<br>
- Each node can reach the other via its own eth0.<br>
- Each node has a working vxlan0, which can ping the other via
its vxlan0, so it looks like the vxlan config is working. (I
used <font face="monospace"><b>ip link add vxlan0 type vxlan...</b></font>)<br>
- Configured route on Host1 like so: <b><font face="monospace">ip
route add <a href="http://192.168.2.0/24"
moz-do-not-send="true">192.168.2.0/24</a> via 172.20.0.1</font></b><br>
- Configured route on Host2 also: <b><font face="monospace">ip
route add <a href="http://192.168.1.0/24"
moz-do-not-send="true">192.168.1.0/24</a> via 172.20.0.2</font></b>
<div>- All guests on Host1 (and Host1) can ping eth0 and vxlan0
on Host2, and vice versa, yay.<br>
- Guests on Host1 <u>cannot</u> ping guests on Host2, I
suspect because the the default NAT config of the libvirt
network.<br>
<br>
So, at this point I started to search for tutorials or more
information/documentation, but I am a little overwhelmed by
the sheer amount of information, as well as a lot of "stale"
information on blogs etc.<br>
I have learned that I can <b><font face="monospace">virsh
net-edit default</font></b>, and then change it to an
"open" network:<font face="monospace"><b> <forward
mode='open'/></b></font></div>
<div>After doing this, the guests cannot reach outside their own
network, nor reach the internet, so I assume that I would need
to add some routes, or something else to get the network
functioning like I want it. There is also <font
face="monospace"><b><forward mode="route"/></b></font>,
but I dont fully understand the scenarios where one would need
an <b><font face="monospace">open</font></b> or a <b><font
face="monospace">route</font></b> forward mode. I have
also shied away from using openvswitch, and have opted for
ifupdown2.<br>
(I have taken most of my inspiration from this blog post: <a
href="https://joejulian.name/post/how-to-configure-linux-vxlans-with-multiple-unicast-endpoints/"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://joejulian.name/post/how-to-configure-linux-vxlans-with-multiple-unicast-endpoints/</a> )<br>
<br>
Some questions that I have for the mailing list, any help
would be greatly appreciated:<br>
- Is my target configuration of a KVM cluster uncommon? Do you
see drawbacks of this setup, or does it go against "typical
convention"?<br>
- Would my scenario be better suited for an "<b><font
face="monospace">open</font></b>" network or a "<b><font
face="monospace">route</font></b>" network?<br>
- What would be the approach to complete this setup?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:libvirt-users@redhat.com">libvirt-users@redhat.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Alvin Starr || land: (905)513-7688
Netvel Inc. || Cell: (416)806-0133
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:alvin@netvel.net">alvin@netvel.net</a> ||
</pre>
</body>
</html>