<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.0.6603.0">
<TITLE>gfs and fencing</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">I'm trying to implement gfs on FC4. I'm following the redhat docs. I do not have the gui. </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">I'm confused about the fencing piece. It implies that fencing is required to allow a service to run on only a single node in a cluster which ensures data integrity. Makes sense if your data resides on ext3 or an equivalent. But it seems to defeat the purpose of GFS. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">In fact, I really only want to utilize gfs and don't want my app to be a service or eligible for failover. I basically want 3 nodes to serve data from the same filesystem. If an app/service/node crashes or fails it's fine, I'll still have 2 serving the same data via the same apps. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">So my questions are, how should I configure fencing? Are there aspects of the cluster I should/can leave out of the mix since I really only want gfs functionality, not ha functionality. Thanks</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Jeff</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>