<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>Re: Re: [Linux-cluster] gfs export over nfs is very slow</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY>  The comment was geared towards the ext3+nfs performance question because it is likely that xfs+nfs can meet the required bandwidth. Gfs is a good tool for increasing resiliency but not for increasing throughput (yet). Michael -----Original Message----- From: Wendy Cheng [<A HREF="mailto:wcheng@redhat.com">mailto:wcheng@redhat.com</A>] Sent: Tue Jun 06 20:37:56 2006 To: linux-cluster@redhat.com Subject: Re: Re: [Linux-cluster] gfs export over nfs is very slow On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 17:16 -0700, Michael Will wrote: > Try xfs which requires centosplus or suse sles9 XFS is not a cluster filesystem - unless you're going to pay for CXFS which is not open source. And be aware that each filesystem has its own strength and weakness. Adding different run time system configurations, when unexpected problems occur, collaborate efforts to trouble-shoot and/or improve the issues are the vital steps to make open source projects work, IMHO. As usual, above are my personal opinions - it is not necessarily my management team's position. -- Wendy -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@redhat.com <A HREF="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster</A> </BODY> </HTML>