<html><head><style type="text/css"></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">How does this help? The power controller is still down<br><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">----- Original Message ----<br>From: Ken Johnson <busyadmin@gmail.com><br>To: linux-cluster@redhat.com<br>Sent: Friday, September 8, 2006 4:18:18 PM<br>Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] power controller is interal/loss of pwer prevents failover: any ideas<br><br><div>On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 11:16:36 -0700, Rick Rodgers wrote:<br>> Does anyone know of a good solution to providing good failover<br>> for somthing like a Dell 1850? The issue here is that the power<br>> souce plug in the back provides power for both the internal power<br>> controller and the node itself. So if you pull the cord it will not<br>> failover because it can not Stonith the failed node (power controller is<br>> down also).<br><br>I've used the fence_ipmi and fence_drac agents for these systems successfully.<br><br>- Ken<br><br>--<br>Linux-cluster mailing list<br>Linux-cluster@redhat.com<br><a target="_blank" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster</a><br></div></div><br></div></div></body></html>