<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Right. That's the way I understood it to be. Using ext3 would require
us to have to umount and remount the file systems to the each host
after the failure, though, correct? In other words, would require
administrator interaction. GFS would do this automatically without
impacting the users.<br>
<br>
Randy<br>
<br>
Lon Hohberger wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:20070820202018.GK26997@redhat.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 03:26:08PM -0400, Randy Brown wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">in order to configure a two-node high availability NFS failover cluster,
I need to use GFS, correct?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
You can use EXT3; you just can only mount the file system on one
node at a time.
With GFS, you can export the same file system from *both* cluster nodes.
-- Lon
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>