<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Yes, slow at best. This list is better. Support is not the issue. I'm shooting for 100% uptime with simple failover. There are too many problems with the software and I'm a month behind schedule. The biggest problem is the core system is malfunctioning. Smaller problem is that in the same test I ran into the fencing issue that others have experienced, the menus are too dynamic for the current fence_apc agent. A month ago I thought, steep learning curve and then I'll be all set. redhat.com gives the distinct impression that they are selling a completed solution. I disagree. scottb BERES Laszlo wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:474DCF13.5060004@sys-admin.hu" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Scott, Scott Becker wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">I've learned a lot during the last month but other than that it's been a waste of time that I can't afford. You Redhat guys might consider having a meeting about adopting Heartbeat or getting serious about finishing Cluster Suite. "Serious" should include real documentation. Interactive documentation would be a great way to let the community contribute. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> no offense: did you try to get help from official RH support? </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>