Hi all. I have a GFS2 cluster of three machines using an iSCSI disk. Everything went fine on the initial tests and the cluster seems to work just great. A couple of days ago I submitted this cluster to a number of file creation operations and whilst this was providing enough load to see some performance data it was also inadvertently deleting some of the files being created for the purpose of the test whilst these files were still being written to. I though this shouldn't be a problem and that a simple fsck would be able to recover the space lost on those inodes. But that doesn't seem the case and I'll show why. DF output: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/gfsvg-gfslv 200G 200G 839M 100% /gfs <div>du -sh output: [root@vmcluster1 gfs]# du -sh 101G .</div> <div> </div> <div>gfs2_tool output:</div> <div>[root@vmcluster1 gfs]# gfs2_tool df /gfs /gfs: SB lock proto = "lock_dlm" SB lock table = "iscsicluster:hd" SB ondisk format = 1801 SB multihost format = 1900 Block size = 4096 Journals = 3 Resource Groups = 800 Mounted lock proto = "lock_dlm" Mounted lock table = "iscsicluster:hd" Mounted host data = "jid=0:id=65537:first=1" Journal number = 0 Lock module flags = 0 Local flocks = FALSE Local caching = FALSE</div> Type Total Used Free use% ------------------------------------------------------------------------ data 52423184 52208404 214780 100% inodes 215085 305 214780 0% <div>As you can see by du's output there's only 101G being used and df's reporting the FS to be 100% used. I've run fsck.gf2 several times on one box on all the boxes but it just doesn't seem to be fixing this right. It reminds me of a post I saw <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=325151">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=325151</a> .</div> <div> When I ran the first fsck I did saw a lot of issues being fixed and I could almost swear that the first time I mounted the cluster FS after repairing it was reporting the right size again. The next time I mounted it it all reverted back to what I show above.</div> I'm using [root@vmcluster1 gfs]# gfs2_tool version gfs2_tool 0.1.44 (built Jul 6 2008 10:57:30) Copyright (C) Red Hat, Inc. 2004-2006 All rights reserved. Anyone with a similar issue ?! Cheers, PECastro