<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#66cccc" text="#000000"> Hi We have executed some benchs on gfs2, gfs compared to ext3 and ocfs2 and the results are (just some examples): <pre wrap=""><big><big>* Read on 1 file : quite the same performance * Write on 1 file : quite the same performance * Creation of many many files and repertories : gfs2 is 10 times less good than ext3 and ocfs2 * Write of a file tree followed by 4 reading process : gfs and gfs2 : 40 mn ocfs2 : 3 mn</big></big></pre> <big>Does it seem normal for you ? or is there some hidden tuning somewhere to increase performances when using gfs2 (or gfs) ? Thanks a lot. Regards. Alain</big> </body> </html>