<font color="#993300"><font face="georgia,serif"><i><b><br></b></i></font></font><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:30 PM,  <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:linux-cluster-request@redhat.com">linux-cluster-request@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Send Linux-cluster mailing list submissions to<br>
        <a href="mailto:linux-cluster@redhat.com">linux-cluster@redhat.com</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
        <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
        <a href="mailto:linux-cluster-request@redhat.com">linux-cluster-request@redhat.com</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
        <a href="mailto:linux-cluster-owner@redhat.com">linux-cluster-owner@redhat.com</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of Linux-cluster digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
   1. GFS2 versus ext3/4 (Devrim G?ND?Z)<br>
   2. Re: GFS2 versus ext3/4 (Fajar A. Nugraha)<br>
   3. Re: GFS2 versus ext3/4 (Devrim G?ND?Z)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:46:10 +0300<br>
From: Devrim G?ND?Z <<a href="mailto:fedora-list@gunduz.org">fedora-list@gunduz.org</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:linux-cluster@redhat.com">linux-cluster@redhat.com</a><br>
Subject: [Linux-cluster] GFS2 versus ext3/4<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1303710370.21043.603.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org">1303710370.21043.603.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
<br>
Are there any downsides of using ext3/4 on a shared-storage setup with<br>
active/passive cluster?<br>
<br>
I'm working on a new PostgreSQL clustering setup, and I'm hardly<br>
convinced that GFS2 will have more protection against ext3/4.<br>
<br>
-- of course, I'm assuming that I'm fencing both nodes properly, so that<br>
their connection with storage is cut off when needed.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
--<br>
Devrim G?ND?Z<br>
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: <a href="http://www.enterprisedb.com" target="_blank">http://www.enterprisedb.com</a><br>
PostgreSQL Dan??man?/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer<br>
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~<a href="http://linux.org.tr" target="_blank">linux.org.tr</a><br>
<a href="http://www.gunduz.org" target="_blank">http://www.gunduz.org</a>  Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 198 bytes<br>
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part<br>
URL: <<a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/f489d129/attachment.bin" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/f489d129/attachment.bin</a>><br>

<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:15:10 +0700<br>
From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <<a href="mailto:list@fajar.net">list@fajar.net</a>><br>
To: linux clustering <<a href="mailto:linux-cluster@redhat.com">linux-cluster@redhat.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS2 versus ext3/4<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:BANLkTikDdDK_HJrQZQcZwpJyGjzwfEEmJA@mail.gmail.com">BANLkTikDdDK_HJrQZQcZwpJyGjzwfEEmJA@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
2011/4/25 Devrim G?ND?Z <<a href="mailto:fedora-list@gunduz.org">fedora-list@gunduz.org</a>><br>
<br>
><br>
> Are there any downsides of using ext3/4 on a shared-storage setup with<br>
> active/passive cluster?<br>
><br>
><br>
If you're sure that only one node can mount it, using ext3/4 gives more<br>
performance compared to gfs(2).<br>
<br>
--<br>
FAN<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/2094f4f0/attachment.html" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/2094f4f0/attachment.html</a>><br>

<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:42:32 +0300<br>
From: Devrim G?ND?Z <<a href="mailto:fedora-list@gunduz.org">fedora-list@gunduz.org</a>><br>
To: linux clustering <<a href="mailto:linux-cluster@redhat.com">linux-cluster@redhat.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS2 versus ext3/4<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1303713752.21043.622.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org">1303713752.21043.622.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 13:15 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:<br>
><br>
> If you're sure that only one node can mount it, using ext3/4 gives<br>
> more performance compared to gfs(2).<br>
<br>
There is no 100% guarantee for it, but of course, it might be worth<br>
trying then.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
--<br>
Devrim G?ND?Z<br>
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: <a href="http://www.enterprisedb.com" target="_blank">http://www.enterprisedb.com</a><br>
PostgreSQL Dan??man?/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer<br>
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~<a href="http://linux.org.tr" target="_blank">linux.org.tr</a><br>
<a href="http://www.gunduz.org" target="_blank">http://www.gunduz.org</a>  Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 198 bytes<br>
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part<br>
URL: <<a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/5228a419/attachment.bin" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/5228a419/attachment.bin</a>><br>

<br>
------------------------------<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Linux-cluster mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Linux-cluster@redhat.com">Linux-cluster@redhat.com</a><br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster</a><br>
<br>
End of Linux-cluster Digest, Vol 84, Issue 29<br>
*********************************************<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Regards,<br>Prince Chauhan  (mob:- 09467206219)<br>HCL Infosystem Ltd. CHANDIGARH<br>E-mail:- <a href="mailto:prince.hclpkl@gmail.com" target="_blank">prince.hclpkl@gmail.com</a><div>
<span style="font-family:arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;border-collapse:collapse"><div><span style="border-collapse:separate;font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font color="#000099"><a href="http://www.hclinfosystems.in/" style="color:rgb(51, 102, 51)" target="_blank">www.hclinfosystems.in</a><br>
<a href="http://www.hcl.com/" style="color:rgb(51, 102, 51)" target="_blank">www.hcl.com</a></font></span></div><div><span style="border-collapse:separate;font-family:arial;font-size:small"><font color="#000099"><span style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;border-collapse:collapse"><p style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:12pt;margin-left:0px">
<b><i><span style="font-size:9pt;color:blue">Technology that touches lives</span></i></b><b><i><span style="font-size:11pt;color:blue"> </span></i></b><b><i><sup><span style="font-size:9pt;color:blue">TM</span></sup></i></b><b><i><sup><span style="font-size:8pt;color:blue"></span></sup></i></b><b><i><span style="font-size:5pt;color:blue"></span></i></b></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><b><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31, 73, 125)"><img src="cid:image001.jpg@01CB3EDF.FD2D61B0" alt="cid:image001.jpg@01CB3EDF.FD2D61B0" width="500" border="0" height="85"></span></b></p>
</span></font></span></div></span></div><br>