<div dir="ltr"><div>are you sure you can add a node in redhat cluster without reboot the whole cluster? </div>use cman_tool status on old nodes </div><div class="gmail_extra"> <div class="gmail_quote">2014/1/24 Alexander GQ Gerasiov <<a href="mailto:gq@cs.msu.su" target="_blank">gq@cs.msu.su</a>> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">//Second try, because previous mail was hold at moderation I think. //Excuse me if there will be dups. Hello there. I need your help to solve some issues I met. I use redhat-cluster (as part of Proxmox VE) in our virtualization environment. I have several servers with SAN storage attached and CLVM managed volumes. In general it works. Today I had to attach one more box to Proxmox instance and found blocking issue: this node joined cluster, proxmosFS started and everything is ok with this host. But it does not have SAN connection, so I didn't start CLVM on it. And when I try to do some lvm-related work on other host I got "clvmd not running on node <node-without-clvm>" and locking failed. Ok, I thought, and started CLVM on that host... and locking still fails with Error locking on node <node-without-clvm>: Volume group for uuid not found: <id> So my question is: How to handle situation, when only part of cluster nodes has access to particular LUN, but need to run CLVM and use CLVM locking over it? -- Best regards, Alexander. -- Linux-cluster mailing list <a href="mailto:Linux-cluster@redhat.com">Linux-cluster@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster</a> </blockquote></div> -- esta es mi vida e me la vivo hasta que dios quiera </div>