[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Use of "[success=ok ...]" form



"Patterson, Ross" wrote:
> > new_authtok_reqd=ok default=ignore]".  I'd *love* to see the SysAdmin manual
> > (http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/Linux-PAM-html/pam-4.html) include
> > the complex forms for all four simple forms so I won't have to go code-diving next
> > time.

Please file a bug report:

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=6663&atid=106663

> > Second problem - coding exactly that results in different behavior from "optional".
> > Specifically, when my test-module returns PAM_SERVICE_ERR, later modules
> > in the stack aren't executed with the complex form, but are with the simple form.

Mmm. This may well be a bug. Could you offer an explicit example
configuration that fails for you and I'll see if I can get to the bottom
of this?

> > What gives?  Anybody understand this stuff?

Well, I thought I did.

Cheers

Andrew





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []