[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: condvar performance in .59 vs .60
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper redhat com>
- To: Jamie Lokier <jamie shareable org>
- Cc: Boris Kolpackov <boris kolpackov net>, phil-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: condvar performance in .59 vs .60
- Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:41:47 -0700
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> A synchronous wakeup is like that. If you can use requeue now,
> there's no need for it, although perhaps some userspace applications
> would appreciate being able to unblock a mutex or whatever without
> being preempted immediately?
It would definitely be worth a try. I think many (most?) applications
would benefit from the waker continue to run.
--
--------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]