From ugya99 at yahoo.co.jp Thu Apr 15 01:36:29 2004 From: ugya99 at yahoo.co.jp (SHIBATA, Makoto) Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:36:29 +0900 (JST) Subject: Cluster Manager without shared disk ? Message-ID: <20040415013629.11581.qmail@web10001.mail.yahoo.co.jp> We are planing two boxes Redhat Advanced Server 2.1. DB2 instance each box without shaerd disks. standby DB2 "Log Shipping" from active DB2. Can we use Cluster Manager without shared disks ? From ugya99 at yahoo.co.jp Thu Apr 15 01:44:23 2004 From: ugya99 at yahoo.co.jp (SHIBATA, Makoto) Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:44:23 +0900 (JST) Subject: Redhat Cluster Manager without shared disk ? Message-ID: <20040415014423.80184.qmail@web10009.mail.yahoo.co.jp> We are planing two boxes Redhat Advanced Server 2.1. DB2 instance each box without shaerd disks. standby DB2 "Log Shipping" from active DB2. Can we use Cluster Manager without shared disks ? Can Cluster Manager supports IP Address Failover without shared disk? From lhh at redhat.com Thu Apr 15 13:33:13 2004 From: lhh at redhat.com (Lon Hohberger) Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 09:33:13 -0400 Subject: Cluster Manager without shared disk ? In-Reply-To: <20040415013629.11581.qmail@web10001.mail.yahoo.co.jp> References: <20040415013629.11581.qmail@web10001.mail.yahoo.co.jp> Message-ID: <1082035993.6483.42.camel@atlantis.boston.redhat.com> On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 10:36 +0900, SHIBATA, Makoto wrote: > We are planing two boxes Redhat Advanced Server 2.1. > > DB2 instance each box without shaerd disks. > standby DB2 "Log Shipping" from active DB2. > Can we use Cluster Manager without shared disks ? Not on RHEL 2.1. On RHEL3, it's possible however unsupported. -- Lon -- Lon Hohberger Red Hat, Inc. --> http://www.redhat.com My Public Key --> http://people.redhat.com/lhh/pubkey.txt From ugya99 at yahoo.co.jp Thu Apr 22 09:37:58 2004 From: ugya99 at yahoo.co.jp (SHIBATA, Makoto) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:37:58 +0900 (JST) Subject: Piranha fos send_program parameter. Message-ID: <20040422093758.46224.qmail@web10006.mail.yahoo.co.jp> Redhat 2.1AS piranha-0.7.0-3 We try "fos" of piranha between two box. When I config "send_program" parameter. Stanby fos fails invoke nanny process, and failover began... When comment out "send_program", Two servers works normally. Where is wrong? [root at db2sby ha]# cat lvs.cf serial_no = 62 primary = 192.168.0.89 service = fos backup_active = 1 backup = 192.168.0.90 heartbeat = 1 heartbeat_port = 1539 keepalive = 10 deadtime = 20 network = direct reservation_conflict_action = preempt debug_level = 2 failover db2server { address = 192.168.0.99 eth0:1 vip_nmask = 255.255.255.0 active = 1 port = 50000 timeout = 60 # expect = "DB2CHECK_OK" # send_program="/home/shibata/scripts/check_db2.sh" start_cmd = "/home/shibata/scripts/start_db2.sh" stop_cmd = "/home/shibata/scripts/stop_db2.sh" } [root at db2sby ha]# From ecroft at OPENRATINGS.com Thu Apr 22 12:00:32 2004 From: ecroft at OPENRATINGS.com (Edward Croft) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 08:00:32 -0400 Subject: Piranha fos send_program parameter. In-Reply-To: <20040422093758.46224.qmail@web10006.mail.yahoo.co.jp> References: <20040422093758.46224.qmail@web10006.mail.yahoo.co.jp> Message-ID: <1082635230.32210.1.camel@ecroft.hq.openratings.com> On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 05:37, SHIBATA, Makoto wrote: > Redhat 2.1AS > piranha-0.7.0-3 > > We try "fos" of piranha between two box. > > When I config "send_program" parameter. > Stanby fos fails invoke nanny process, and failover > began... > > When comment out "send_program", Two servers works > normally. > > Where is wrong? > Makoto, piranha in its distributed form does not support send_program in FOS. However, a patch has been made available by Sebastien Bonnet that allows for this feature. If you are able to receive tar files, I can email the tarball to you. -- Edward M. Croft Sr. Systems Engineer Open Ratings, Inc. 200 West Street Waltham, MA 02451-1121 From ugya99 at yahoo.co.jp Fri Apr 23 07:17:23 2004 From: ugya99 at yahoo.co.jp (SHIBATA, Makoto) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:17:23 +0900 (JST) Subject: [piranha]fos support AFT Message-ID: <20040423071723.77338.qmail@web10002.mail.yahoo.co.jp> My server(Dell PowerEdge 1750) has two ethernet devices. eth0 and eth1. piranha fos can assign one device to "address" parameter. address = 192.168.0.218 eth0:1 How can I configure these duplex devices to fos? AFT? alias IP? Dell PowerEdge 1750 piranha-0.7.0-3 ipvsadm-1.18-8 From ugya99 at yahoo.co.jp Fri Apr 23 09:15:40 2004 From: ugya99 at yahoo.co.jp (SHIBATA, Makoto) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:15:40 +0900 (JST) Subject: [piranha]fos support AFT In-Reply-To: <20040423071723.77338.qmail@web10002.mail.yahoo.co.jp> Message-ID: <20040423091540.33313.qmail@web10007.mail.yahoo.co.jp> Sorry. This is a drivers problem. My server has "bcm5700" Broadcom BCM5704 1000Base-T. Driver has BASP(Broadcom Advanced Server Program for Linux) utility. BASP make virtual interface. and I can set device to "lvs.cf". > address = 192.168.0.218 hogehoge0:1 Is is correct? --- "SHIBATA, Makoto" ? > My server(Dell PowerEdge 1750) has two ethernet > devices. > eth0 and eth1. > > piranha fos can assign one device to "address" > parameter. > address = 192.168.0.218 eth0:1 > > How can I configure these duplex devices to fos? > AFT? > alias IP? > > > Dell PowerEdge 1750 > piranha-0.7.0-3 > ipvsadm-1.18-8 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Piranha-list mailing list > Piranha-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list From peterbaitz at yahoo.com Fri Apr 23 16:46:55 2004 From: peterbaitz at yahoo.com (pb) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:46:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Persistance and LVS In-Reply-To: <004701c39fe3$50b07500$0a00a8c0@comp> Message-ID: <20040423164655.29150.qmail@web60008.mail.yahoo.com> Hello LVS / Piranha, I have PERSISTENCE set to 900 (15 min) for HTTPS/HTTP which shows up like this with "lvsadm -L" TCP mp-cluster.jmu.edu:https wlc persistent 900 -> rserver1:https Masq 1 3 47 -> rserver2:https Masq 1 1 211 -> rserver3:https Masq 1 1 224 We use this for Mirapoint WEBMAIL. Some people have recently complained that for about a month, they begin experiencing INVALID SESSION ID errors after typing in a lengthy email and clicking SEND. We've been using Piranha/LVS for a couple years, and never seen this, and it is not everyone having this problem, many do not. We're checking with our mail vendor too, but we just recently upgraded Red Hat Linux 7.3 + Piranha to Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS v3 + Piranha Cluster Svcs about 45 days ago - thats how long one of the two Piranha clusters has been up. Any insite as to how PERSISTENTS of 15 minutes facors into someone typing a message in WEBMAIL for example for 30 minutes, would be well appreciated. Thanks, Peter __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25? http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash From U.Criola at patrick.com.au Fri Apr 23 16:49:06 2004 From: U.Criola at patrick.com.au (U.Criola at patrick.com.au) Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 02:49:06 +1000 Subject: Currently On Leave Message-ID: I will be Out of the Office Start Date: 23/04/2004. End Date: 10/05/2004. I am currently on leave. I will be returning to the office on MOnday 10/05/2004