[Pulp-dev] PyPI names for Pulp3

[Brian Bouterse]

+1 pulpproj
-0 pulpproject
-0 pulp_platform
-1 plp
-1 pulp3

Also I'm +1 to having the top level namespace (the name above) contain the
subnamespaces i.e. 'platform', 'common', 'streamer', and 'cli'. So that
would be a 'yes' to [0].

[0]: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2444#Will-all-packages-install-
under-a-top-level-directory-or-not

Thanks for pushing this forward.

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:43 AM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> Agreed. +0 to pulpproj for me.
>
>
> David
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Jeremy Audet <jaudet at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> > 2) pulp3
>> >     - is ambiguous regardless of if the 3 is for Pulp3 or Python3.
>>
>> Yes. Also, using "pulp3" makes it easy for a naming conflict to occur
>> with the existing PuLP <https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PuLP> package. What
>> happens when their project also gets to version 3? Or when their project
>> gets to version 4, and downstream packagers want to have a separate package
>> for versions 4 and 3 of PuLP? One could say that this won't be an issue on
>> account of the differing capitalization of the projects' names. But I don't
>> think that capitalization is a good differentiator, as demonstrated by the
>> NetworkManager project.
>>
>> And less importantly, using "pulp3" will force us to switch to "pulp4,"
>> "pulp5," etc as new major versions of Pulp come out.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20170504/025fda28/attachment.htm>