[Pulp-dev] Tracking GA issues

Robin Chan rchan at redhat.com
Wed Apr 18 18:11:21 UTC 2018


+1 to both of those proposals (3.0 and 3.1)

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Daniel Alley <dalley at redhat.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Dana Walker <dawalker at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I like this idea for tracking purposes so that things do not fall by the
>> wayside and for organization of future aims.
>>
>> --Dana
>>
>> Dana Walker
>>
>> Associate Software Engineer
>>
>> Red Hat
>>
>> <https://www.redhat.com>
>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:04 PM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We’ve been removing the Pulp 3 MVP tag from pulpcore issues in redmine
>>> that we’re not going to complete for the Beta next week but some of these
>>> issues we may want for the 3.0 GA.
>>>
>>> I’d like to propose we create a Pulp 3.0 milestone in redmine for the
>>> Pulp project and start adding issues to it. I was also thinking we could
>>> perhaps create a Pulp 3.1 milestone as well.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180418/0a7ac16a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list