[Pulp-dev] content guards

[Jeff Ortel]

I'd like to get broader input on #3968 from comment: 
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3968#note-14 on.

I don't think this falls within the classic discussion of thin/fat 
models.  Mainly because the methods included in what is considered a 
/fat/ model by django are still confined within the concerns of the data 
model.  We already have a few /fat/ models such as RepositoryVersion.  
What's being discussed for content-guards (and previously discussed for 
sync and publish) is different.


[1] 
https://django-best-practices.readthedocs.io/en/latest/applications.html#make-em-fat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20181012/eb5ad576/attachment.htm>