[Pulp-dev] Nomenclature Clarification

[David Davis]

+1 to pulp-api. Perhaps one day in the far, far future our descendants will
find some better API format than REST and we can spare them the pain from
having to rename the ‘pulp-rest-api’ service.

David


On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:48 AM Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:34 AM Eric Helms <ehelms at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Within Pulp 3, I've found myself struggling to refer to the pieces of the
>> runtime deployment and wanted to raise a few questions I keep coming back
>> to.
>>
>>  1) Per [1], pulpcore seems to reference the entirety of the server,
>> workers and resource manager that live within the repository at [2]. Is
>> that correct?
>>
>
> Yes, that is what pulpcore means.
>
>
>>  2) What is the 'server' called? I keep wanting to call it the
>> 'pulp-api-server' or 'pulp-api-app' or 'pulp-api'.
>>
>>
> I like the name pulp-rest-api or pulp-api.
>
>
>>
>> - Eric
>>
>> [1]
>> https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/glossary.html#term-pulpcore
>> [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190313/6262422c/attachment.htm>