[Pulp-dev] pulp_rpm and current backwards-compatibility problems

[David Davis]

What if you create a 3.11 release branch and then revert the commits on the
3.11 branch? That would save you from having to reapply the two commits.

You could also pin to pulpcore < 3.12 on the 3.11 branch to get the branch
passing while you work on fixing the enqueue problem on master.

David


On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:49 AM Grant Gainey <ggainey at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hey folks,
>
> We've been talking about how we need a pulpcore/3.7-to-3.11-compatible
> release of pulp_rpm. The static_context change requires a schema-change,
> and it has to be available to katello-3.18 (and hence pulpcore-3.7)
>
> The static_context change is PR#1984
> <https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1984>
>
> Right now, pulp-rpm/master has changes that require pulpcore/3.12 or
> later. Those changes are:
>
> d0c9badd Refactor distribution migration 0032
> fbaadaca Add support for automatic publishing and distributing
>
> In addition, pulp_rpm/master is *currently broken* because it still
> references the deprecated enqueue_with_reservation(), that just got removed
> from pulpcore/master.
>
> As I understand it, what needs to happen #SOON, is the following:
>
>    1. revert the two commits above and merge,
>    2. get the static_context change updated (since a migration will have
>    Left the Building) and get it merged,
>    3. merge any other fixes that won't break 3.7-compat [OPTIONAL], and
>    THEN
>    4. cut 3.11 as compatible with 3.7-thru-3.10 pulpcore
>
> Once pulp_rpm/3.11 is released, we can then:
>
>    1. re-apply the auto-pub/dist-schema changes,
>    2. fix enqueue-problem,
>    3. mark pulp_rpm/master as 3.12+ compat, and finally
>    4. release pulp_rpm/3.12 to be ready for pulpcore-3.13
>
> And this all needs to happen by next week?
>
> Is there anything I'm missing here?
>
> G
> --
> Grant Gainey
> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20210511/2bfd9f9d/attachment.htm>