<div dir="ltr"><div>I think we should only keep builders that we plan to use which would be for the current bugfix Z-stream, the next feature release, and for pulp3. We're not loosing anything because brining them back is trivial using Jenkins Job Builder. The docs builders page is getting increasingly long so I think we gain simplicity by only keeping things we plan to use. We would delete 2.10 and older builders.<br><br>Also, I propose the "docs maintainers" group should figure out how to create/destroy these to reduce the burden on the release engineer. Right now the docs builders are being maintained as part of the build process which we probably should change even though I'm about to merge this PR[0].<br><br></div><div>I see now that the '*-build' name corresponds with the release config file name. I think leaving them named as they are now is good, but we need some documentation.<br><br></div>+1 to waiting to hear from smyers regarding the *-build which show red.<br><br>[0]: <a href="https://github.com/pulp/pulp/pull/2902">https://github.com/pulp/pulp/pull/2902</a><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Tanya Tereshchenko <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ttereshc@redhat.com" target="_blank">ttereshc@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I agree that it makes sense at least to stop running 2.10-* docs
builders on a regular basis because we do not expect any new 2.10.z
release.<br>
As for deletion I can see no harm here as well but then we should
consider deleting builders for 2.8 and 2.9 as well. <br>
<p>Is there any other possible builds which we may need for docs
except nightly, beta, rc and release? I think '-build' or
'-testing' works for me, since it is going to be manual irregular
build for testing :)</p>
<p>As discussed on IRC #pulp-dev, let's talk to Sean about configs
and version naming, so I am not making any PRs in that area till
then.</p>
Thanks,<br>
Tanya<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<div class="m_-1351052736549894418moz-cite-prefix">On 12/19/2016 02:53 PM, Brian Bouterse
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Thanks for explanation. That all sounds correct. Here are
some related thoughts regarding our docs builders. I'd like
some feedback on these ideas.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>I think we should delete all docs builders for 2.10-
including the -build, -release, and -dev builders. We don't
use them anymore and the docs will continue to be served
without disruption.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Should we rename the builders ending in '-build' builders
to be '-beta-or-rc'? Or maybe '-testing'?<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Also your PR is going to fix the two failing docs builders
right? I can review that if that is helpful. I'm hoping to see
all the docs builders go green.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Thank you!<br>
</div>
<div>Brian<br>
</div>
<div><br>
<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Tanya
Tereshchenko <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ttereshc@redhat.com" target="_blank">ttereshc@redhat.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> I expected '.beta' or
'.rc' to be present in the 'version' in config [0] but
according to the docs [1], this is not the case because
2.11 is released.<br>
I was not aware of that policy, so everything is correct
:)<br>
<p>But when there will be Beta or RC version, expect docs
to be published at <a class="m_-1351052736549894418m_1125998487511421358moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://docs.pulpproject.org/en/2.11/testing/" target="_blank">http://docs.pulpproject.org/en<wbr>/<pulp_version>/testing/</a><b><br>
</b></p>
[0]
<a class="m_-1351052736549894418m_1125998487511421358moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/config/releases/2.11-build.yaml#L10" target="_blank">https://github.com/pulp/pulp_p<wbr>ackaging/blob/master/ci/config<wbr>/releases/2.11-build.yaml#L10</a><br>
[1]
<a class="m_-1351052736549894418m_1125998487511421358moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/config/releases/README.md#xy-buildyaml" target="_blank">https://github.com/pulp/pulp_p<wbr>ackaging/blob/master/ci/config<wbr>/releases/README.md#xy-buildya<wbr>ml</a><span class="m_-1351052736549894418HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Tanya</font></span>
<div>
<div class="m_-1351052736549894418h5"><br>
<br>
<div class="m_-1351052736549894418m_1125998487511421358moz-cite-prefix">On
12/19/2016 11:07 AM, Tanya Tereshchenko wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<p>We have jobs for dev and release branches and
this *-build ones are for the rest which is
basically Beta and RC builds and they are
triggered manually when needed. That's my
understanding.<br>
<br>
I expect them to be published under 'testing/', so
for 2.11-build they should be here: <a class="m_-1351052736549894418m_1125998487511421358moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://docs.pulpproject.org/en/2.11/testing/" target="_blank">http://docs.pulpproject.org/en<wbr>/2.11/testing/</a><b><br>
</b>because of the way path is constructed [0]
[1].<br>
<br>
I am looking at configs now and they do not seem
to be correct to me. I'll make a PR to see if
others agree.<br>
<br>
[0] <a class="m_-1351052736549894418m_1125998487511421358moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/docs-builder.py#L75-L78" target="_blank">https://github.com/pulp/pulp_p<wbr>ackaging/blob/master/ci/docs-b<wbr>uilder.py#L75-L78</a><br>
[1] <a class="m_-1351052736549894418m_1125998487511421358moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/pulp/pulp_packaging/blob/master/ci/docs-builder.py#L170" target="_blank">https://github.com/pulp/pulp_p<wbr>ackaging/blob/master/ci/docs-b<wbr>uilder.py#L170</a><br>
<br>
Tanya</p>
<br>
<div class="m_-1351052736549894418m_1125998487511421358moz-cite-prefix">On
12/17/2016 08:26 PM, Dennis Kliban wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>These two Jenkins jobs are currently failing and I am not sure where they are supposed to publish docs to. Can someone explain what the purpose of these jobs is? I'd like to fix them.
-Dennis
______________________________<wbr>_________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
<a class="m_-1351052736549894418m_1125998487511421358moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Pulp-dev@redhat.com" target="_blank">Pulp-dev@redhat.com</a>
<a class="m_-1351052736549894418m_1125998487511421358moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/pulp-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<fieldset class="m_-1351052736549894418m_1125998487511421358mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
<a class="m_-1351052736549894418m_1125998487511421358moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Pulp-dev@redhat.com" target="_blank">Pulp-dev@redhat.com</a>
<a class="m_-1351052736549894418m_1125998487511421358moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/pulp-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div></div></div>
______________________________<wbr>_________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
<a href="mailto:Pulp-dev@redhat.com" target="_blank">Pulp-dev@redhat.com</a>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/pulp-dev</a>
</blockquote></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>